Pix 1: The Godfather Part 3As I watch and ponder over the current UMNO elections, my mind wanders to recent democratic elections, ours and the United States in particular, as well as the upcoming Indian and Indonesian (Presidential) elections.
My mind wanders to a scene in Godfather 3...
Don Altobello, an ageing New York Mafia Chief as well as an old friend of the Corleones, but in reality was scheming against them (Lesson numero uno...your most trusted ally in life, can be your most dangerous foe!), was plotting to kill Michael Corleone and had hired Mosca da Montelepre, a master assassin.
The conversation goes like this...
Mosca: What can I do for you...?
Don Altobello: I have a stone in my shoe. You can remove it.
Mosca (leans over menacingly): Only one stone?
A stone in a shoe.
Well, you see, I have a stone in my shoe and it hurts! The stone has a name too...no, not Michael Corleone. It’s called the ignorant voter. The ignorant voter in a democratic process.
Consider this.
Pix 2: One vote!Mr ABC is a young father. He graduated from University, nothing great. No First Class Honours but made it nonetheless. Found a job, salary OK but no complaints. Married his school sweetheart and has a child (or two) whom they adore and spoil as much as they can. He reads and keep abreast with the goings on around him. He reads the local daily and magazines (off the shelf at the newsagent…too expensive, ha ha). He’s aware. He knows who are the political leaders in this country, ruling and opposition, and tries to determine what’s good for him in his own way with discussions with friends, all races, at work and after hours.
He gets ONE vote.
Pix 3: One vote too!DEF did not graduate from any meaningful education institution with any qualification to speak off. No matter…that’s the fault of the Government (he says). He has no job. No matter, he has a motorbike and some of those illegal night race, where they tear down a road in the early hours, gives out money prizes. At any rate, kopi tarik and Maggi mee goring is not expensive. No family. He reads but only to find out which starlet is going out with which prominent VIP, whom he can’t remember nor place. The sordid details are what he is after. As for the current rulers of the country...Nope…don’t know so and so, but he knows they are corrupt. How does he know this...err, well, of course they are corrupt...(someone told him, no need to check, hearsay must be true!!)
He gets ONE vote.
And there is my stone, my gripe with the democratic voter.
Pix 4: Voting.OK, OK, I know I know...all of us are entitled to the vote. I am all for that but consider this. DEF does not care, is not interested, is not in the least motivated to care for this country. His vote, due to his indifference and sorry state, is open to manipulation and is indeed bought over by unscrupulous tactics of any political party. His vote, however, is also a determinant factor as to where we are headed. Indeed in a democratic system, where ONE vote may make a difference, he is important. Very important.
Now, I ponder...is that fair?
In the United States, I dare say the Hollywood factor is a strong determining force. The voters, though more educated and probably accessible to more media coverage, are probably still swayed to a certain degree by this factor. Though educated, they are swayed by a dream, dreams conjured by films, music videos and the likes.
In the UK, I have come across reports that Gordon Brown is too dour looking! What’s that got to do with performance?
An uneducated voter profile is open to manipulation. The end results are clear to all of us.
In Thailand, the urban voters have installed a new government, through allegedly undemocratic means, as they claim the rural 'uneducated' voters (who are in the majority) were tricked into voting the previous government.
India is next. The world’s largest democracy? Really. Are we to pride ourselves in the fact that everyone can vote one in a few years when these very voters have no idea nor clue as to what these politicians represent? Politicians whom they will see again till the next election?
I read a Bloomberg report recently that there is an actress in Indonesia who made a name clad in a mermaid suit who will contest!!
The vote is sacred. It’s not to be given away freely...oops shades of dictatorship huh? The vote, if you will, must be earned. Indeed everyone must have a vote but the vote...dare I say it…must come with points. Sort of, DEF gets one vote. ABC gets 1.5 votes etc etc. Done social work…add 0.25 to the vote...Like a driving license. Points deducted for wrongdoings!
Wishful thinking?
Either that or we need to educate voters as in creating awareness through quality education but… I’m pragmatic. It’s NOT going to happen. My guess is the current situation serves politicians, of any shade, well.
What could be more easier than to say to DEF…'Hell, you are a good guy actually but have suffered some social injustices...let's parachute over the North Pole!’.
There you go, ONE vote in the pocket! As for ABC…arghh…he’s the difficult one, reads around. Write him off. There’s plenty of DEF. It’s democracy after all...majority wins.
Ouch, this stone hurts like hell!
www.nineoverten.com
www.daylife.com

15 comments:
Salam Ruby,
Lama tak dapat baca artikel yang mencabar minda untuk mengikutinya.
Agaknya itulah sebabnya kenapa hasil pemilihnan pemuda berbeza dengann siapa yang terpilih untuk VP, NP dan ahli2 MT. Wallahua'lam.
Uhuh! Now I know how some politicians get to the top!
Oh gosh! I don't know how comfortable I would be knowing my vote counted less than someone else's! I understand where you're coming from. But I think instead of quasi-disenfranchising certain segments of the public, we ought to change who gets to run. In other words, introduce laws so that political parties must nominate a certain types of people for political posts (a minimum of 30% women, a minimum of 30% between X and Y age group, a minimum of 30% with earnings of between $X and $Y, etc.) That way we can increase the chances of selecting a good group of people to run the government -- I mean, that's the real problem, isn't it?
Also, I think you should be a bit more cautious about the markers of progress you have chosen. Take for example level of education. I can think of at least one cousin and one aunt who have not had a university-level education, and one business associate of my husband's who does not have a university-level education. And guess what? They would make fine voters, in my opinion. From my observation, they're highly capable of rationalizing between two choices.
Besides, if you really think about it, the higher education system is nothing more than an industry to make money. Going to university is not a virtue, it is a consumer choice! :) {sorry Ms. Ruby, me being cheeky here}
Salam Zabs,
Terima kasih atas kata2 yang memeransangkan bagi saya untuk blog ini.
Itu lah pernah saya kata kan, 'Ahli politik yang bijak & petah berucap, ahli politik yang penuh karisma, tidak bererti ia mencerminkan kemurnian hati & niat nya'.....Sekarang ini ramai yang senang terpengaruh dengan kata2 manis & juga tomah2 yang membabit si (salam isi)...:)
Hi Wah, yeah, politics is after all the art of the possible..:)
Hi Ms Diz,
Oh dear, got to go now. Will chat with you soon. Great stuff.
Hi Diz,
Thanks so much for your input here. Let's get in on it:
I would be the first person to disagree that non attainment of a first class degree or even a general education, relegates a person to the realms of a failure.
As a matter of fact, many of us have lots & lots of friends who are deemed very successful & have not completed formal education.
In fact the profile of DEF, is not really a profile of a non educated person as far as degrees etc is concerned. You might have noticed that he is also non caring of what goes on around him, typically breaks the law as far his activities are concerned, he's most likely unemployed by choice.
To be honest, I doubt most of the people we actually know fall into this category.
My question therefore, should such a person (of DEF profile) decide our fate?
I have therefore gone further in saying that education is in fact needed for everyone to hold or to exercise that sacred responsibility called voting.
It may even be idealistic as I have pointed out perhaps politicians prefer the current status as it is, as this serves them.
Ahh..your idea of a good mix of people up there...hmm...
Forgive me my dear, I don't quite see your solution being practical & possible too lah. Having good people good choices at the top so that a typical DEF, has no way of making a mistake is wonderful but at the same time also idealistic & impractical...ha ha..
Think about it. If the choice at the top are made of good people already, why have voting at all?
It would appear therefore that both of us are idealistic & impractical ...LOL...but then again why not eh?
Hi d'Ruby Ahmad,
You are thinking like the black swan -- the impact of the highly improbable.
Your critique fits the bill of the imperfection of democracy.
Hello Hi&Lo,
How are you? So nice to hear from you.
You are right! That's just what I did. It is really my personal frustrations where I've observed our critical mass has been reduced substantially due to the growing number of DEFs with erosion of standard of education.
Thanks for hopping by again.
d'Ruby Ahmad,
From Mar 4 - 18, was back in Ipoh. How fast time flies.
I seldom comment these days cos under work pressure.
Politics these days is playing up the gallery. Not much attention to real needs to be addressed. am getting fatigue.
We have to remind ourselves not to get too fixated with ideology.
Fooled by randomness. Not yet laid hand on the book. But I think it's about being "deceived" by what we see. We assumed our perception as the truth but we don't see may lie the key.
Even medical science which is supposed to be an exact science but it's limited by evidence that is available.
Docs never tell their patients that there is Evidence of No Disease (END). At best the result is No Evidence of Disease (NED) which means no pathological cell detected and that doesn't mean the body is free from disease.
We're both working towards the same goal, just approaching it from different angles, which is cool by me :)
I still disagree with you. Maybe I'm missing something? We both seem to agree that there is vote-buying and scare-mongering in our political system. Also, you and I both agree that we need a way to neutralize this effect. As I said earlier, my suggestion is that we rig the top, so we improve the chances of selecting a good group of people the next time we have elections.
The definition of "good group" is relative. We'll need different kinds of leaders for different kinds of situations, correct? What's good for these next 5 years may not be good for the following 5 years. For that reason, we'll always have a need for a change in government. Even if the economy is smooth sailing, at the very least, we'll need leaders who are up-to-date with the ways of the world. In with the new, out with the old.
The reason I say we should rig the top is because, for me, it's a moral imperative to allow everyone an equal vote without discrimination. Everybody has rights, even the DEF you describe has them (what is DEF btw?!). The rights I'm talking about are things like: that we are all equal before the law, that we each have one vote. We need to protect these rights because they're the starting point of all our political negotiations. Without them, upon what basis would we move forward?
Nice discussion by the way :)
Hello Hi & Lo,
Oh you were in KL. Please holler the next time.
I understand what you're saying. I too do not get that emotional with politics anymore. It is very much same old same old.
Even with some change of people at the helm, but the old ways are still here to stay.
I'd say, it is like watching wayang kulit. What we see, is not what is!
So I'd rather do my own thing & make the difference on my own platform. We may not have as big a voice or say, but we are at peace, not having to compromise our ways.
Hi Dizery,
Thanks so much for your interesting input.
My question is.... 'how do we rig the top?'
Presumably this change of law regarding the requirements needed to be an elected representative, will be done by the law makers themselves! The very people of whom, some... maybe ineligible, when the laws are implemented.
This is very tricky, for I don't think they would be so sincere into taking this route. It is like putting a noose round their own neck. This will not happen, somehow, the way I see it.
It is therefore...still... the electorates, themselves, who need to get the people into the proper place. An electorate that is enlightened, I mean... would be the possible answer. Don't you think?
Hello Ruby, just dropped by say hello.
Hope this finds you well.
Very interesting posting this.
I never trust politicians....ha ha.
You keep well and keep a song in your heart, best regards, Lee.
Hi Lee,
Hey apa khabar? What a surprise? Honestly I have not been blogging for awhile. To busy enjoying FB & now trying to understand Twitter...it will never end all these new applications.
Yeah, Lee, politicians are such a breed isn't it? They have brought untold miseries to the world...I think the world is more peaceful without politicians.
Yes there must be music in our hearts.
Thanks for visiting Lee. You keep well.
Post a Comment